Thursday, September 10, 2015

GE2015 Snippets: CSJ, Tharman, LHL, WP

Chee Soon Juan

On September 7th, he recited his farewell letter to JB Jeyaretnam.

This act, my friends, is the pinnacle of politics. The Everest of rally speeches. A winning move. It served to evoke the heart, connect the mind, and make you want to name your child, don't care son or daughter, Soon Juan. It draws you to him as you realised he had allowed you to experience an episode with a legendary figure in Singapore politics.

I think Chee Soon Juan knows 100% that his recital will produce the intended result, and I applaud the man for his brilliance. I've been watching too much House of Cards (and Veep, got to watch Veep too to balance things out) the past years, and Frank Underwood will be very proud indeed.

That is why I can't shake off this thought... What if he attained absolute power?


A person I'd like to see at the very top of the food chain is Tharman. He addresses issues rather then point fingers. I like this man, even if his statements are not perfect.

i) The median income in European countries may be taxed very high, but housing and cars are much cheaper. Although, I don't disagree with Tharman, other countries are large and their people aplenty, they don't face the problems that we do. If anyone is interested here is a list of the median nett income in Europe up to 2013.

ii) On the topic of our guaranteed interest rates in our CPF account, it is of not much use to us because we need our CPF to buy our HDB. The higher the interest rate (as Tharman had mentioned with much glee that it has been increased), the more accrued interest we have to pay back.

Lee Hsien Loong

Which brings me to your boss. He said no cash is needed to buy house because you can use your CPF to pay for it after the generous $60k (with T&C) grant on a $100K (with T&C) house. Yet we need to put the money back into our CPF including the accrued interest. Or don't we? I am confused.

You two ah.

Still, I'd rather see Tharman as PM. If there is a chance that by Hsien Loong being out of parliament Tharman can then take over as PM, I will dare to not vote for Hsien Loong. After which my husband kindly reminded me that the position might go to Teo Chee Hean. That sent an iceberg down my spine faster then you can say global warming, and therefore I would rather play it safe and leave Hsien Loong as PM.

Hsien Loong very good at saying other people no good.


You broke the spoon.


There is no spoon.

Wednesday, September 02, 2015

Chee Soon Juan v2.0

I grew up with the incarceration of Chee Soon Juan, watched him, heard him, and saw his fall. As much as Lee Kuan Yew was notorious for his ability to ruin politicians (read Devan Nair's open letter to Lee), I did not feel sorry for Chee. He was, to me, a rather huge ruffian. He was too aggressive for my taste. I believe in democracy, but I do not believe in forcing it down people's mouths.  

On the other hand, he could have turned out that way because there were no other channels that would hear him. Being pounded to powder by lawsuits and jail terms by people in power would test the limits of your restraint (wiki). Yet, I still see him as not one who could bring his people to freedom. The enthusiasm he harboured was turning into vindictive hate. 

My husband was the one who brought him back into my picture. He asked me to watch him again. Chee Soon Juan has mellowed down, he said. I didn't believe him until I watched 1st September's GE2015 forum. He was indeed extremely composed. He spoke of relevant issues, and was not at all accusatory. I am going on a personal observation here by saying that the mad anger in his eyes was gone.

Whichever the case, I welcome his change and am happy he managed not to turn into a psychopath. In full disclosure, I really thought he was. 

Then again, his Speaker's Corner speech in 2006 was rather composed as well. With that in mind, I am sitting on the fence as to whether he had indeed calmed down and put our welfare in mind. If Chee Soon Juan can stay on this path, I believe he will be do good for our country as an non-PAP member in parliament. 

These buggers on the other hand (in alphabetical order)... 

Ang Yong Guan: Aiyoh uncle, you keep waving your pamphlet, and your solutions aren't very viable. Cannot lah. On the bright side, I would rather have you in parliament then Kee Chiu.

Denise + Lawrence, Kee Chiu + Sim Ann: Wahlau how many times you want to bring up town council deficit? Plus, Hsien Long already did his PAP speech during the national day rally. The longest "PAP CAN DO EET" speech in recorded history. We don't need to hear it again. Lastly, Lawrence buay sui go and drudge up cemetery dirt to throw it in Soon Juan's face, not cool lah. Move on can? Sibeh chao lor you camper.

Kenneth Jeyaretnam: Aiyoh you keep trumpeting the same notes. Over. And over. Again. You keep pointing fingers. This one very bad. That one very bad. Lucky you not my boss.

Tan Jee Say: I don't know if you're here for your country, or for your own vanity. 


Monday, March 23, 2015

My Thanks to LKY & Co.

Say what you will about the man and his questionable iron ruling, but give the job to another and I believe we would become the latrine of South East Asia instead.

We also should not forget Goh Keng Swee, Rajaratnam, and Toh Chin Chye amongst others.

My thanks to the people who made the effort from the 60s to the 80s, setting aside their differences and building up a city state. My sympathies to those thrown into jail by ISA without trial. My respect to those who fought with and against PAP.

These make up our history, with Lee Kuan Yew as the bullseye taking most of the credit and the scorn. Rest in peace, dear sir, may you never need to rise from your grave.

Source: AP

Sunday, November 16, 2014

No, SG Is Not Going To Shits: Another View of Raffles Place Stabbing

Comments always irritate me to no end. I should stop reading comments. Yet, like an invisible force that the remnants of your bowel movements have over you to make you look, I still click and read. Seriously, I should stop.

Commentary on the recent stabbing at Raffles Place buzzed around how Singapore isn't a safe place anymore. I knew I'd be irritated by such narrow views, yet I still continue to read the ridiculous paranoia and xenophobia.

"Surely not local. SG not safe. Distressing. Nothing good. What happened. Not like last time. Tsk Tsk Tsk." Tongues have been wagging like menopausal aunties at a wedding banquet.

My views were contrary. What greatly struck me about the article was that people actually stopped the robbery. They participated in apprehending the culprit. Do you realise what this means? It means that I have to readjust my outdated view that Singaporeans are passive aggressive slobs who would just stand by and Stomp.
"Mr Nazir also saw a woman, who he believes to be in her late 20s to early 30s, holding on to one man's shirt sleeve. Not knowing who was in the wrong, Mr Nazir, who is a police national serviceman, went up to detain the alleged assailant.
Another passer-by later helped hold on to the alleged robber's lower limbs, he said."
"(Mr Nazir) was asked by the police to make a statement later that night. Asked about the kudos he has been getting online, he said: "If a lady was brave enough to hold on to the guy, then why should I be afraid?""
I had expected folks to whip out their cellphones like, you know, some sort of super citizen journalist vigilantes they think they are while the robber got away. Which was also what happened of course.
"However, (Mr Nazir) said he was disappointed that there were many others who stood by to record the incident instead of helping."
What I gathered from this incident isn't a doomsday prophecy that Singapore is going to shits. Rather the opposite, it gave me hope. Singaporeans actually have decent social ethics. They saw, they reacted fast, and the assailant was detained. If we maintain this trajectory, we will actually develop into a more cooperative and cohesive society.

I'd like to bring up Johor at this point though, where Malaysians live in fear of robberies everyday, and chances are if they were to derail an armed robbery they would be facing groups of parangs instead of one knife. It is understandable that most Malaysians would be reluctant to help out in such dire circumstances. From first hand accounts of my Malaysian friends, break ins with parangs are common, and yes their neighbours won't help because you may be a robber pretending to be asking for help. It doesn't mean their social moral compass is tardy, it is just that their reactions were born out of different circumstances.

Crime rates on our island could also be dependant on our neighbour's economy. We can't just point and shoot at foreign workers here without seeing other variables. There are many people less fortunate compared to those on our island. If I were a robber, I would also imagine Singapore being an easy target because we aren't used to robberies here. We're a people that like to wag our tongues and complain how badly we have it. I won't be surprised how easy it may seem to just snatch and go, because I too thought that our locals would go the way of China, remain frozen, and simply watch the scene unfold.

So yes, fellow people living on this island with me, take this incident and look at it from another angle. Try to avoid shouting how only FTs are to blame, or crudely debating why we should pay a dying LKY. Instead, have faith that our crime rate would be lowered as long as we remain vigilant. In other words, Singapore is still moderately safe, so let's not take things for granted. When crime rates spike, we'll need to collectively counter it as much as we can in our own ways.

Our island may not be going to shits after all, we're actually quite an alright bunch of folks.


Nah, give you more hope. Don't keep complaining SG damn cb.


Wednesday, November 05, 2014

Paying Politicians To Do Jin Bo Liao Things

Okay chewing gum I can somewhat agree, it gets extremely irritating when you kena gum on your shoes, hands, hair, buttocks, etc. It is still nevertheless embarrassing that our country banned it.

Now, like how your parents forced you to wear them big plastic nerd glasses to school because they don't want to buy you cool ones, the nation's politicians has once again embarrassed me by banning Shisha. Really... Shisha... Why on earth? Is it because you can't find a way to tax it?

Yes, Shisha may provide a different array of heath hazards and aren't a healthier replacement from cigarettes, so why don't you ban both if you want locals to be healthy? In fact, why not just tax Shisha tobacco, it's what you're good at, taxing all the fun and decadent stuff in Singapore. Have the nation's politicians gone the way of 'Murica and decided to ban Shisha so that cigarette tobacco companies can maintain their obscene profits? You know, the way major corps rub shoulders with politicians because that's where you can bend policies to your favour. That may be quite unlikely, us going the way of American politics, but it's not one to rule out. One can speculate since our government is hardly transparent with us.

Every so often, in between telling us that we are so much better off then our communistic or religiously oppressive Asian counterparts, you smoke us with epic-thousand-face-palms worthy announcements. Let me list down some thoughts I have about Singapore when you were making the decision to ban Shisha:

The issues of astronomical health care costs and insufficient hospital beds aren't resolved yet. But you ban Shisha.

The lower income and disabled welfare pay outs are still meagre. But you ban Shisha.

AWARE needs encouragement to update their gender biased no-men-allowed rule and should realise that one of the more formidable methods of abolishing females being discriminated and objectified would be through fathers guiding their sons. But you ban Shisha.

How about that horrid sexuality education workshop that slipped past MOE's eye, but god forbid we put a gay penguin book in the library? We need to address outdated mentalities and encompass diversity; male and female roles have evolved. But you ban Shisha.

Business owners need positive reinforcement on providing more for their staff in terms of salaries and benefits. But you ban Shisha.

The massive issue on the influx of Filipino and China's Chinese workers that even reduced the pay scale of our Malaysian counterparts is still floating around. But you ban Shisha.

The potential to become Asia's Switzerland through educating a culturally, emotionally, and intellectually wholesome society is not unattainable as long as we just start to dare to try. Yes, just a start, to dare to try, we could do so many things. But. You ban. Shisha.

Instead of progressing and updating your policies, trusting your people, granting autonomy to voters on matters of national agendas, promoting a healthier work life balance to enhance the living standards of already disgruntled Singaporeans, or preventing the disturbing growth in the number of keyboard warriors, you come up with something like banning Shisha simply because it's as unhealthy as all the other things we Singaporeans have been gorging on.

You know what else is embarrassing? Chan Chun Seng saying single mothers enjoy the same benefits as married mothers when they clearly don't. To name a few differences, single mothers do not receive baby bonuses and they are only entitled to half the maternity leave. See? Another issue that urgently needs addressing.

But what do you do? You go ban Shisha.


Friday, August 15, 2014

Roy Ngerng and His 5300.

A supporter of Roy Ngerng recently asked Singaporeans to donate $1/mth to support Roy as an NMP. 5300 Singaporeans would suffice. Apparently to her, Roy has now become a messiah of sorts for the common people maligned by a tyrannical CPF system. He is the one that will speak up for the masses where none had dared to. He has sacrificed his livelihood for the good of the people. For a better Singapore!

Just wow.

1. Roy Ngerng now appears to have pulled off a City Harvest. Not in the misappropriation of funds or anything of that illegal sort, but more in the sense of having a feverish supporter asking for money on his behalf.

2. I cannot fathom in a million years how he speaks for me. What would be your credentials Roy? Not referring to anything academic, we have tons of those A Star A hole blokes in parliament doing A shit. How about the sensibility to foresee things in a grand scale? Or analysing possible repercussions of every policy change? Maybe you can relate to the everyday folk because of the education you got on the street? A good balance between humility and power? Let's just start with having a good head on your shoulders by not slandering a very rich Prime Minister. No? I guess not.

3. So... you are passionate and you write it in your blog. If I want to support a blogger as an NMP, I'd rather give $10/mth to Mr Brown.

The CPF issue has its flaws, but the reasons behind its restrictions are not too far fetched either. How would one handle a senior citizen blowing their retirement fund on a metaphorical Nigerian prince? Yet, it is arguable that a person is entitled to spend their savings however they want to.

CPF is only one issue, and new Singapore has more then one problem. Has Roy in his youthful life experienced diverse avenues that may sometimes meander into dark alleys? Issues of education, racial and gender discrimination, sexual violation, human trafficking, abuse, labour, foreign integration, or simply a better society overall regardless of which class you are from. In fact, how about we start with the eradication of the ridiculous self-entitlement most Singaporeans have. I am sick and tired of my own uncles complaining how the government aren't helping them in any way because they do not want to work. I repeat: They do not like work.

It angers me that Roy thinks himself as speaking on behalf of Singaporeans. If there is a chance, it would be in the future when through maturity he will no longer be blinded by angst. James Dean was cool, but unfortunately Roy does not have his publicist. What he does have is his head in a cloud that is shaped uncannily like his bottom.

I cannot easily kick out those A Star A holes out of office and stop paying them, but at least with Roy Ngerng I do have a choice. If Roy had wanted some money because he was crippled by the Prime Minister, then yes I would donate to him.

Lee Hsien Loong and Roy Ngerng have one thing in common. Both of them need to grow up.


Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Vid: The Known Universe by AMNH

The universe fascinates me. I guess it is the closest thing I have to a religion, in that I believe in stardust.

I have a respect for my own demise one day, but I fear the death of my husband and my unborn child more so then my own. It is a crumbling fear, so much so that I will cry dry tears. If he is around when my irrationality strikes, I will simply hug him, look at him, or take a whiff of that musk he carries around. C'est la vie, as my heart aches.

When it comes to my parents, siblings, relatives, and friends, I do not fear so much. My respect for death also mean I have already imagined them dead, and that I have taken stock of the necessary steps I need to make so that the living may handle it as best that they can.

But my husband... I cannot imagine. It stops at loss, and a white wash of grief floods in. He is my only kryptonite.

This is where the universe comes in. Imagining the unimaginable makes me realise we are all but minute creatures within a speck of dust. This is my faith. The cosmos is my god. Earth is not forever. We will go back into the universe as stardust. The magnitude of what the universe is may be incomprehensible to our brains. Our hardware may simply not be equipped to hold such information. And this is how I am spiritual. My husband, my family, my friends, our bodies will all go back into the system again. Who knows where our souls will end up.

For now, I'll live life as much as I can in this casing I am given, with the knowledge that the greater universe cares as much for human lives and us humans care about dead skin cells.

Remember, if you're having a bad day, take comfort in that your boss, your client, their money, it will all be stardust one day. We often tend to forget how minuscule we really are.

Awesome vid yo.